Skip to content
HTML5 Incompatible Browser
Gold Banner

Will government stem the spending crisis and the course of wealth devaluation?

*Texas Straight Talk, by Congressman Ron Paul, October 21, 2013

”The debt ceiling deal increases spending above the levels set by the ‘sequester.’  The sequester cuts were minuscule, and in many cases used the old DC trick of calling reductions in planned spending increases a cut.  But even minuscule and phony cuts are unacceptable to the bipartisan welfare-warfare spending collation.  The bill also does nothing to protect the American people from the Obamacare disaster.

As is common in bills drafted in secret and rushed into law, this bill contains special deals for certain powerful politicians.  The bill even has a provision authorizing continued military aid to opponents of the Ugandan ‘Lord’s Resistance Army,’ which was the subject of the widely-viewed ‘Kony 2012’ YouTube videos.  Most of these unrelated provisions did not come to public attention until after the bill was passed and signed into law.

Members of Congress and the public were told the debt ceiling increase was necessary to prevent a government default and an economic crisis.  This manufactured fear supposedly justified voting on legislation without allowing members time to even read it, much less to remove the special deals or even debate the wisdom of intervening in overseas military conflicts because of a YouTube video.

Congress should have ignored the hysterics.  A failure to increase government’s borrowing authority would not lead to a default any more that an individual’s failure to get a credit card limit increase in would mean they would have to declare bankruptcy.  Instead, the failure of either an individual or a government to obtain new borrowing authority would force the individual or the government to live within their means, and may even force them to finally reduce their spending.  Most people would say it is irresponsible to give a spendthrift, debit-ridden individual a credit increase.  Why then is it responsible to give an irresponsible spendthrift government an increase in borrowing authority?

Congress surrendered more power to the president in this bill.  Instead of setting a new debt ceiling, it simply ‘suspended’ the debt ceiling until February.  This gives the administration a blank check to run up as much debt as it pleases from now until February 7th.  Congress can ‘disapprove’ the debt ceiling suspension, but only if it passes a resolution of disapproval by a two-thirds majority.  How long before Congress totally abdicates its constitutional authority over spending by allowing the Treasury permanent and unlimited authority to borrow money without seeking Congressional approval?

Instead of seriously addressing the spending crisis, most in Congress would rather engage in last-minute brinksmanship and backroom deals instead of taking the necessary action to reign in spending.  Congress will only take serious steps to reduce spending when either a critical mass of Americans pressures it to cut spending, or when investors and foreign countries stop buying US government debt.  Hopefully, those of us who understand sound economics can convince enough of our fellow citizens to pressure Congress to make serious spending cuts before Congress’s reckless actions cause a total economic collapse.”


*This information is solely a highlight of the opinion of a third-party publication and is incomplete.  Please subscribe to this publication for the full and timely opinion of the author and call a Monex Account Representative for any additional up-to-date information. This is not an offer to buy or sell precious metals. Investors should obtain advice based on their own individual circumstances and understand the risk before making any investment decision.

Aftershock Investor